jakiro
Author: Mario watch web3, web3 developer source: x,@web3_mario
introductionTheDuring the May holiday, Eigenlayer released its EIGENTOKEN white paper. In a strict sense, this is not an economic white paper aimed at introducing incentive models and the traditional sense of value, but brought a brand new business system to everyone — Intersubjectivestaking based on EIGENTOKEN, after reading the full text of the white paper (not in -depth reading the appendix) and the predecessor’s interpretation of it, I have some their own feelings and understanding, hoping to share with the monarchs and look forward to discussing it.The conclusion first, I think the significance of Intersubjectivestaking is that it proposes a consensus system based on a bifurcular ERC20TOKEN model, which can be used to make decisions on some “group subjectivity” issues, and at the same time, most people are tyranny.
What is “group subjectivity”
Correct understanding of the Intersubjective is the prerequisite for understanding the meaning of the system. Regarding how to translate the word, there seems to be a unified conclusion on the Chinese Internet. After reading the article of Mr. Pan Zhixiong, it is quite identified.Good ones are used to understand its meaning, but I feel that the concept of “group subjectivity” seems to be more consistent with the literal translation. Therefore, in the following text, I chose to use “group subjectivity”Essence
What exactly is “group subjectivity”, in the context of Eigenlayer, refers toThere is a extensive consistent consensus between all positive observer groups in a certain system in a certain system.,,Then calling this kind of affairs has Internetubjective,,That is, group subjectivity.We know that one of the core values of EigenLayer is to decide the consensus layer and execution layer and focus on the construction of the former to maintain, thereby serving consensus, reducing the development costs of Web3 applications, and giving full excavation of the potential needs of the market.In the narrative of the White Paper, Eigenlayer seems to position itself as a decentralized digital public platform that can perform digital tasks for third parties, so naturally it is necessary to analyze the boundaries of its service, that is, what type of digital tasks can be clearly clear.The execution of its “credible”.In the context of the web3, “credible” usually means that a system is used to avoid digital design or economic models to avoid digital tasks. ThereforeEssenceEigenlayer divides the execution errors of digital tasks into three categories:
Objective Attribution errorsTheThis type of error refers to a set of objective existing evidence (usually refers to the data on the chain, or data with DA). Without relying on the trust of a specific subject, it can be derived through some logic or mathematics derivation.The execution error of the digital task proved by the method.For example, a node in Ethereum signed the two conflict blocks. This error can be proved through cryptographic science. Similar to this also includes the fraud proof process in OPROLLUP.If there are dispute data to reorganize, the judgment error can be made by results comparison.
Crossing subjectivity attribution errorsTheThe mistake of this class refers to the execution error of the execution criteria of all participants in a certain system in a certain system.Through the error of this class, it can be divided into two categories.
-
At any time, you can go back to the error of identification of past data. For example, in the price prophecy machine, the spot price of BTC in btc in Binance at 00:00:00 on May 8, 2024 is $ 1. This error will be within any time afterwards.Can be identified.
-
Only real -time observation can observe errors, such as malicious censorship, assuming a long -term transaction by a group of nodes maliciously refused to execute.
Invisible errorsTheThis type of error refers to the execution errors that have not yet determined the criteria for judging standards, such as judging whether Paris is the most beautiful city.
>
And the IntersubjectiveStaking is precisely hoping to effectively solve digital tasks with group subjectivity attributes, which means that the digital task execution errors that can be performed by the group subjective attribution type can be dealt with.It can also be said that this is the expansion of the system on the chain.
Most people in the current solution
The so -called most human tyranny is a political terms, which refers to the majority of the minority in the parliament that the vast majority of the seats in the parliament will infringe the rights and interests of a few people.After clarifying Eigenlayer’s goal, let’s take a look at the current types of solutions for such problems.Total two types according to the summary of Eigenlayer:
1. Punishment mechanism:This type of mechanism is usually deterred by encrypted economics and punished the pledged funds of evil nodes to deter malicious behavior. Stakingslash is one of them.Most nodes in the system decide to conspire to do evil together, and you can choose to ignore the proof and even punish honest nodes.
2. Committee mechanism:This type of mechanism usually sets a fixed committee node group. When there is controversy, it will be submitted to the committee node to approve the accuracy of evil proof.The system also means collapse.
These two schemes are obviously obvious.This shows the difficulty of solving such problems. Although there is a unanimous judgment of the accuracy of the execution results, due to the lack of objective verification capabilities, it can only be changed from the trust of cryptography or mathematics.When most people choose to do evil, the current scheme is incompetent.
Through a bifurid workThe social consensus ability brought by token avoids most people’s tyranny
So how does EigenLayer solve this problem? The answer is to design a chain -to -split worker, and based on the social consensus capacity brought by the worktokenstaking, handle the number of digital digitalization tasks of the group, and avoid the occurrence of major tyranny violations.question.
So what are the so -called social consensus capabilities that can be brought by forks, and how does it avoid the problem of tyranny by most people?First of all, Eigenlayer pointed out that inspiration comes from the study of ETHPOS consensus.It believes that Ethereum’s security comes from two aspects:
-
Economic security:By requiring nodes to pledge funds and design a punishment mechanism for malicious behaviors, the economic cost of evil exceeds potential returns to prevent malicious behavior.
-
Social consensus:When a bifurcation occurs due to the chain due to certain malicious behaviors, because of the consistency judgment criteria for the correctness of the execution results, any goodwill or honesty can choose according to their subjective observation of different fork execution results.The correct fork, so that even if the malicious node has mastered most pledged funds, when most people have a tyranny problem, they will accompany the user’s abandonment of malicious forks, making the value of the fork chain gradually reflects super malicious chain.For example, most CEXs will choose the correct but small pledge support support, and abandon the malicious chain that is wrong but a lot of pledge support. With the universal social consensus, the value of the malicious chain will gradually disappear, and the fork chain will be re -become a reopen.”Orthodox split”.
We know that the essence of the blockchain is in a distributed system that has reached a consensus on the order of a group of affairs. On the basis of this, Ethereum has designed a serial execution environment EVM.Below, EVM will reach an agreement.EIGENLAYER believes that most of the assessment of the execution results of such transactions is objective and attractive, but there are also group subjectivity attribution.Specifically refers to the assessment of Chain Liveness dimension.There is a special Inactivity Leak mode in Ethereum’s POS consensus mechanism. When more than 1/3 nodes of nodes cannot be properly produced due to certain unknown situations. At this timeIt is due to the interruption of the Internet as a whole in a certain region with another region.Then Ethereum will have a fork. When the consensus mechanism is found, it will enter the Inactivity Leak mode. At this time, the new block will not be rewarded by inflation. At the same timeThe pledged funds reappeared more than 2/3.This will make the two fork chain gradually re -enable their own encryption economic security.
After that, which chain will become the so -called “orthodox split”. At this time, it can only rely on users to take the initiative to choose according to their own judgment standards. This process is “social consensus”.Then, with the active choice of users, the value of the two fork precipitation will be offset until the competition of the encrypted economic security, a bifurcation will achieve a significant victory.This process can be regarded as the security given through social consensus.
>
To sum up this phenomenon, EigenLayer believes that Ethereum is identified by social consensus and solves group subjective errors related to chain consistency, that is, the so -called chain activity attack, and the core of this social consensus ability comes fromDo not want to judge which party is evil immediately, but accompanied by subsequent users to vote with their feet and resolve differences by the ability of social consensus.In order to make a penalty immediately, this has the ability to resume Dongshan, and this method shows its value.
Therefore, following this judgment, Eigenlayer reference and upgrade a consensus model called Augar’s chain gaming protocol on the chain of Augar, and proposes a WORK token on the chain, called EIGEN.It also designed an Intersubjective Staking mechanism around EIGEN to solve the implementation consensus of group subjective digital tasks. When there is differences in the execution results, the conflict is resolved by the social consensus in the subsequent time window.Specific technologies are not complicated. There have been introductions in some articles, and discussions will not be held here.I believe in understanding the above relationship, and I can better grasp the meaning or value of Eigen Intersubjective Staking.
