jakiro
Author: OneKey Chinese Source: X,@OneKeycn
Recently, the technical editor of Bitcoin’s “Bitcoin Magazine” of Bitcoin’s old authority @Brian_trollz has released the “Reporting Qualification Policy” about its tokens and BTC L2.Among them, the definition of BTC L2 is “no token, no trusted withdrawal, and unable to leave Bitcoin and runs” -This aroused theory.Let’s take a look at the wonderful comment area and major brothers.
Someone gave a arrangement about the BTC L2 in the comment area. I hope that Bitcoin Magazine can “stamp” one by one, so that everyone can know what L2 can be reported by them.Bitcoin Magazine CEO replied: We are looking for a full -time L2 report writer, and he will invest time to analyze these contents.
>
Someone directly asked the three L2 — LIquid, RSK, and Stacks that the overseas communities were more concerned. In the eyes of Bitcoin Magazine’s editor, L2 was counted.SPook’s reply is: “Liquid and Rootstock meet all three standards of their BTC L2, Stacks does not use non -BTC tokens as native assets (so is not).”
Maybe I saw the relevant discussion.Stacks’s co -founder @muneeb directly pushed his statement that “Bitcoin Magazine” would not affect Stacks at all, and believed that only the L2 that could only meet the needs of users and wins in the free market.He advocates allowing the market to develop freely, and everyone should focus on expanding the Bitcoin market share.
Someone asked, if there is a chain that he said that he is a “side chain”, and does not emphasize that he is L2, will it be considered L2?SPOOK replied that BTC completely uses BTC as the side chain of native assets, which can meet the standard and serve as L2.Regarding “unable to run away from Bitcoin”, he believes that because this side chain requires BTC to run, or united mining, it is also in line.
Compared with the rationality of Stacks Lianchuang, Bitcoin Frontier Fund manages partners and pizza ninja Lianchuang TREVOR.BTC@to directly expressing the “disappointment” attitude -even ridiculous.
Look at it
He believes that this so -called standard directly affects all BTC L2 with its own original currency, and it seems to be “targeted at” Stacks -almost every investment company and analysts with reputation in this field willRSK is the same position.He said that this move would destroy innovation, which also caused no one and institutions in the past three years to build and invest in “cool things” on Bitcoin.
For Stacks, he explained in depth that Stacks’s decentralized bridge and safety mechanism need to have his own native currency.This tokens serve their users for a reasonable and legal purpose.”Bitcoin Magazine” believes that a second layer must use BTC as a local token, otherwise it is “bad”. This view is ridiculous and has no reasonable technical or economic foundation.This is not based on facts, but based on personal opinions and politics.
In addition, he was disappointed as a person who had written three technical review articles for Bitcoin magazine. He was disappointed with “only because of his own tokens, excluding many new and interesting BTC L2”.What is even more ironic is that he asked: These BTC L2 are still encouraged to sponsor the Bitcoin Magazine at a price of hundreds of thousands of dollars, and at the same time treat it as a third -class citizen, which is a bit flavorful.Can these L2 be allowed to sponsor the magazine media, but isn’t it enough to be included in important technical analysis or covering news value and Bitcoin innovation?
Later, he expressed his hope that Bitcoin Magazine would re -consider his position. This position is based on technology and economic foundation rather than any personal opinion.
We are entering a new era of Bitcoin innovation, and the worst thing that Bitcoin magazines can do -is to start to eliminate a large number of Bitcoin builders based on any standard.
Kol@Dotkrueger, a well -known investor in the industry, criticized:The standard is too early now.It seems that “Bitcoin Magazine” has begun to do the “L2 Halal Test” before the real BTC L2 solution that does not need to be trusted.
If you are not “halal”, you will be regarded as “parasitic”.Why don’t you write a technical challenge/possible solution first?
ORIDNAL Market Bioniq’s CEO@Bobbodily helped them make a big review.Assuming that according to their standards, the schemes that are basically not idealized are not too idealized, or they can be implemented first.Some people tease the following comments, and basically all ETH L2 cannot be called L2.
You can see that the community has more negative attitudes, thinking that this standard is too strict and hinders innovation.In fact, similar discussions have been many times in the Ethereum community.For example, V God first supported Plasmas, and later changed his mouth, and even repeatedly reversed on some issues.
So no matter what the “standard”, it has to be given to the market practice in the end.Quoting the words of the group friends: “L2 Builder is assured of flying, our leek will always follow.”
