jakiro
1. Why did anyone tell the Buffett Duan Yongping (Bitcoin)?
In fact, someone has already tried it.The person in charge of an exchange once took Buffett’s dinner, and introduced the old gentleman to the old gentleman at that dinner.
But the result was that the old gentleman was still solidified, and he was not moved.
I think this may not be that they are not talking well, but more of a living attitude of the old gentleman ——— he has reached a world-class level in his field, and he has his best career., Live your favorite life, why must you go to a field you do n’t like in this state and engage in an operation that you are not good at?
This is like I am not used to short -term operations and technical indicators, but if someone sells me to sell this operation and theory in this area, in addition to the politeness, I will deal with it.Not interested.
In my daily life, very few people including my friends, colleagues and even relatives know that I still have my own hobbies and operations in the encryption field.But unless you have to be talked to others about my activities in encrypted ecology, I will not take the initiative to mention things about Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Everyone has their own fate and track. If you have a fate to get in touch with the encrypted ecology and find your own opportunity here, of course, it is good, but if you missed the encrypted ecology, you can find what you are better in in another field and ideal.Life is equally exciting.
2. How to think of MATIC to POL
Regarding MATIC to POL, I have shared in the last online exchange, and the overall feeling is still good.
The main change of this project is not to change the name of the tokens, but that Polygon wants to become the second layer of Ethereum and the Agglayer that is building.
Just two days, I read a report on chain abstraction on MESSARI.This report mentioned Polygon’s Agglayer when analyzing the abstract liquidity of the chain, which gave me a deeper understanding of this project.
>
Looking at the future, if Agglayer can really become a polymer for blockchain fluidity along the way the project party expects to provide a unified liquidity for chain abstraction, then the imagination space is still good.
However, as far as the moment is concerned, these seem to be relatively far away, because the entire Defi ecology is still lying flat in the past, there is no innovation.Therefore, chain abstraction seems to be so important for the current DEFI, and the value of the project may not be reflected.
3. Defi ecology is innovative?
Recently, I didn’t seem to find a relatively large DEFI innovation, but I saw that MESSARI’s report mentioned that the new exchanges emerging from some two -layer extensions of Ethereum were very strong in attracting liquidity. In addition, some changes in MakerDao and UnichainRelease.
I think these “innovation” is at most as business transformation or business expansion, and it is not technically and model -based innovation.
Write here, pull a gossip:
Recently, I started to spend more time reading MESSARI reports, mainly focusing on some analysis reports on projects and ecology.Regarding DEFI, I found that more and more studies have begun to focus on the real benefits of excavating projects, not simply surrounding tokens (especially token airdrops, expansion, positioning, etc.).This method and angle have become closer to the analysis of stock fundamentals in traditional finance.
This trend is becoming more and more obvious, and it is more and more valued by the head DEFI project.From another perspective, this also means that at least in the DEFI ecology, the era of wealth around the currency speculation has gradually left us.
