ZEST —— 100%capital efficiency stable currency on BLAST

Foreword

With BLAST’s announcement of testing online, after 50%of shorts are distributed to developers, ecology will inevitably face the problem of optimization of funds.Among the existing stablecoin CASE, at the typical 150% mortgage rate, users need a mortgage worth more than $ 150 to purchase a $ 100 stablecoin, and the remaining $ 50 is not fully utilized.This model represents serious inefficiency.

>

How to better attract and use the current liquidity of more than one billion US dollars on the Blast chain has become a question that all Crypto world has ambitious development teams that must be considered, and ZEST has given their answers.

Zest Introduction

Different from other chains, the sufficient liquidity on the BLAST is given to developers a new proposition- “how to maximize capital efficiency”, or simplify it, how to help users better leverage.

>

In response to this proposition, the answer given by Zest is to decompose the yield and volatility to achieve a stable currency of 100%capital utilization efficiency.

Project core mechanism

One of BLAST’s innovative design is that the ETH on all BLAST networks has native income. Above this, the protocol layer can perform various operations, such as LSDFI.

When users pledge Blast_eth worth $ 150 in ZEST, they can get ZUSD worth $ 100 and Leveraged Blast_, a $ 50.Blast_eth’s yield is inherited by ZUSD, and the volatility is inherited by Leverad Blast_eth.The specific process can be described by the following formula

$ $ 1 ∗ Blaster = K ∗ ZUSD+1 ∗ LBETHK $ $

In the upper formula, 1 BLAST_ETH can cast K a ZUSD and 1 lbeth_k.When the price of ETH fell to $ k, lbeth_k faced liquidation.After the launch, considering the risk preferences of different users, the agreement of the agreement introduces a diversified K value.

>

By decomposing volatility and yields, the ZEST protocol can meet the needs of two types of users at the same time

  1. Risk disgust, pursuit of farming income users

  2. Because all the fluctuations in Blast_eth are absorbed by the Leverad Blast_eth, ZUSD has risk -free leverage income.

    >

    Assuming K = 1000, ETH price has risen from 1800 to 3000, and the APR of Blast_eth is 4.5%, then there is Zusd Stake APR = (3000**4.5%)/(1000**0.5) =27%,,Six times to native APR(27%/4.5%)

    1. leveruser

    2. It is also assumed that the price of ETH has risen from 1300 to 3000, and K = 1000, then the value of Ibeth will increase from (1300-1000) to (3000-1000) to achieve nearly 7 times the income.

      The specific design has not been launched on the token side, and this part is left for follow -up discussions.

      Summarize

      Due to the particularity of Blast’s abundant liquidity, the above protocol can better focus on its own product mechanism and economic model design to achieve higher leverage and higher capital utilization efficiency.So we can see more excellent designs on it.

      ? AS Blast Intropus a Large Number of Yield-BEARING AsSETS, where should the ad?

      Old, Uninspired Defi Projects May Lack Innovative Solutions, But Zest is Here to ProvideEntirely NewandOriginal AnswersThen, then

      • RISK-AVERSE or YIELD-LOVING Users Can Obtain Stablecoins withleverageyield.

      • DEGEN or Leverage-LOVING Users Can Access Long-Term on-Chain Leveraged Derivatives

  • Related Posts

    The governance battle behind Aave DAO and Aave Labs’ power game

    Author: Chen Mo, source: X, @cmdefi The recent heated debate between Aave DAO vs Aave Labs and the dispute over governance rights at the protocol layer and product layer are…

    2026 Encryption Market Outlook: Embracing the “Web3 New Plutocrats” Era

    Author: danny; Source: X, @agintender In 2023, the “Los Angeles Times” once again selected Indomie as the world’s best instant noodles.This quick-cooked food from Indonesia has not only conquered taste…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Looking back to 2025: What progress has been made in global crypto regulatory policies?

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 2 views
    Looking back to 2025: What progress has been made in global crypto regulatory policies?

    Web3 The Dilemma and Future of Chinese Entrepreneurs

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 0 views
    Web3 The Dilemma and Future of Chinese Entrepreneurs

    Brother Maji’s leverage game: Where does the “endless” money come from?

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 1 views
    Brother Maji’s leverage game: Where does the “endless” money come from?

    Coinbase: From regulated centralized exchange to on-chain Silicon Valley

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 1 views
    Coinbase: From regulated centralized exchange to on-chain Silicon Valley

    The Economist: Cryptocurrencies’ real threat to traditional banks

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 0 views
    The Economist: Cryptocurrencies’ real threat to traditional banks

    Ethereum 2026: Is ETH undervalued via MVRV indicator?

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 2 views
    Ethereum 2026: Is ETH undervalued via MVRV indicator?
    Home
    News
    School
    Search