jakiro
Source: Dao said the blockchain
Recently, the Uniswap ecosystem came out a news:
On the evening of February 23, Erin Koen, the head of the UNISWAP Foundation, initiated a proposal to the UNISWAP Governance Forum and suggested that the cost mechanism rewarded those UNI token holders who had commissioned and pledged their token to token.
Affected by this news, the price of the UNI token was immediately raised.
I will focus on some of my thoughts with you:
First of all, we must pay attention to:At present, this proposal is only a proposal, and the subsequent voting is also required to be executed and implemented after being approved.
From the current situation, the proposal does not seem to have a warm response among the related interest parties that have influence and decision -making.
Therefore, whether this proposal can be passed in the end, I am afraid that many internal games and comprehensive considerations will be passed.
I think there is a factor worth considering: if the proposal is passed, how can we respond to the challenge initiated by the US Securities Regulatory Commission?
Because once this proposal is passed, it is obvious that the tokens are linked to commercial profit, which is essentially an electronic stock.But the issue of this “stock” has not been regulated.
This is a risk that may be detonated at any time.
Secondly, the proposal and the executor of the proposal are two different entities in the legal sense.
The proposal is the Uniswap Foundation, and he has developed towards the community.The executor of the proposal is Uniswap laboratory, which truly develops the Uniswap protocol.
From the differences between their identity, we can all understand why the foundation proposes this proposal?Because from the perspective of the community, it is definitely the most conducive to the community directly to the token.But from the perspective of agreement developers, it must be that focusing on the development of the agreement itself is what they are most concerned about.
Therefore, the two attitudes towards this proposal will be obviously different.
So I think it’s too optimistic about this news or a little earlier.
However, if we look optimistic, if the proposal is really approved and then executed, it will undoubtedly have a profound and significant impact on the Defi and even the entire encrypted ecology.
Old readers who have read my early articles know that in the last bull market, I held UNI tokens, but after the UNI tokens in my hands at the end of the bull market, I have never bought a UNI token in this bear market.Essence
The fundamental reason is that I think the empowerment of UNI tokens is too bad.The only so -called “governance” function of tokens does not make much sense for ordinary holders, because the UNI token holders are basically teams and important investors.Only they have the ultimate influence and decision rights for UNISWAP’s governance.
But once the token empowerment can be solved, it will have the following impact:
The most direct thing is that the empowerment of UNI tokens has been greatly improved, and the price of tokens will definitely be much better than before.
This is the most direct favorable for the project itself and each token holder.
Secondly, the issuing tokens that are only issued by the DEFI projects are only the governance functions. I am afraid that the rear dust of Uniswap will be paid, and they will empower their tokens. The governance tokens of the DEFI project will probably usher in Pop.
If we expand some scope, we will find that many tokens that are now expanded in the second layer of Ethereum are only governance functions.If this gate is opened, I believe that these projects will take the same way by then, and the second -level expanded tokens will usher in general rising.
In the end, all the projects that have been dedicated to long -term development will have to be empowered.
Of course, all these optimistic estimates are based on the premise of the proposal.But as I wrote in the previous article, there are many uncertain factors that the proposal can be passed in the end.
So let’s not be too optimistic for the time being, look at its changes.
