jakiro
Author: Mu Mu; vernacular blockchain
Recently, Harris, the US Vice President and the next presidential candidate, officially stated that it will support digital assets. As the main competitors of another high -support presidential candidate Trump, it will be obviously important for encrypted assets.Although the crowd of encryption KOL has said that Harris’s active role has brought by this, it is believed that Bitcoin and encrypted assets are too early to talk about it.Intersection
01What do you think of the next US president?
The US presidential campaign of the “Finals” is imminent. No accidents. One of them will become the next US president in a few months.Before Harris once kept “silent” about encrypted assets, Trump did not conceal his support for crypto assets.
Just like the previous article “>How high is Trump’s Bitcoin conference promised?As mentioned in “Trump and Harris represent the very different political opinions of the Republican and Democratic Party, respectively.The Republican Party tends to support and participate in technological innovation and market freedom, while the Democratic Party’s claims, including environmental impact and sustainability, financial inequality, social justice, and more powerful supervision, etc., reflect their weakening of personal freedom and power, emphasize public publicity, emphasize public publicity, emphasize the public of the publicAnd the values of collective interests.In the past, the environmental impact of Bitcoin mining and the seemingly unequal wealth acquisition of individuals made Democratic parties full of prejudice against crypto assets.
However, Democrats do not mean that they are always leaning left, and the ultimate goal of the two parties is the same.Harris has expressed support for crypto assets more than once recently in public. Harris said on Wednesday when he gave a speech at the Pittsburgh Economic Club.Under her leadership, the United States will maintain a global leading position in the key areas of “shaping the next century”:“Maintain the dominant position in artificial intelligence and quantum computing, blockchain and other emerging technologies.”
Earlier, an analyst thought that Trump came to power to facilitate the Bitcoin and encrypted markets, and Harris may be the opposite.Some analysts now have different views. VANECK analysts said that Harris may be more beneficial to Bitcoin because this will “accelerate many structural issues used by Bitcoin.”
At this point, after Harris’ commitment and statement, it means that no matter who comes to power, he will take office as the next US president, which will be more friendly than the current Bayeon government (relatively not so friendly), at least on the surface.
02What do you think of supervision?
As we all know, the U.S. regulators under the leadership of this year’s Biden have brought many troubles and challenges to the crypto market, especially the American SEC that has been prosecuted by the day, and its anti -encrypted chairman Gary Gustler (Below), continuously release unfinished remarks and warnings.
Recently, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Investor Education and Propaganda Office issued an announcement on Monday that investors should understand that Bitcoin and Ethereum have huge volatility and are highly speculative investment.The US SEC warns that spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETP have risks such as price fluctuations and fraud in unmarried markets.Securities supervisory agencies emphasized that “Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETPS did not have the registration of the 1940 Investment Company Law as an investment company.”Therefore, they lack asset custody and valuation protection suitable for ETF and common funds.
In general, regulators have always been vigilant, perhaps the responsibilities, or maybe because of Gary’s anti -encrypted plot and prejudice, let the next leadership team replace him with a lot, and it will be better for a person.However, SEC will still be vigilant and alert investors to pay attention to risks.After all, in essence, these decentralized assets are always a force that they are difficult to control. Even if encrypted assets contribute to innovation and technology, the conflict behind them will not be secure.
03What do you think of the institution?
The funds of the institution usually vote with “feet”. From the inflow of Bitcoin ETF’s funds, you can see how the institutions think of.Recently, Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas posted on the X platform that the US Bitcoin ETF has reached US $ 17.8 billion since the beginning of the year, a new high, and the goal of 1 million bitcoin has achieved 92%.Close to Nakamoto’s position.Data show that Satoshi Nakamoto holds 1.1 million BTCs, and Bitcoin ETF holds more than 916,000.
At present, most of the world’s largest fund management companies have carried out encrypted assets business. Berlaide launched the Bitcoin ETF more than the position of the grayscale funds, becoming one of the largest institutions in Bitcoin’s positioning.Essence
Unlike the SEC that Bitcoin is a risk asset, the institutions have successively improved their understanding of crypto assets in recent years.In the eyes of institutions, from simple risk assets, it is gradually excessive to an alternative asset that plays the role of hedging under special circumstances, which has special significance and role.Some financial, currencies and geopolitical risks that other assets may face in the investment portfolio can face.
04What do ordinary people think?
Because the general public does not have the professionalism of institutions, the general public is still uneven about encrypted assets, which is related to the degree of friendliness of crypto assets in different countries and regions.
Picture source: B2Broker
Country and regions that have clearly prohibited or do not support the circulation of encrypted assets in Qatar, Egypt, Bangladesh, and Morocco are unrequited areas.In Malta, Singapore, UAE, Germany, Portugal, Switzerland and other crypto -friendly countries, they usually provide clear regulations and regulatory frameworks, and set up fund investment and support and promote the establishment and development of innovation and innovation.Through these top -down support innovation, ordinary people generally have a higher level of awareness of crypto assets.
Due to the limited understanding of the people, the comments of encrypted assets in social networks in non -friendly countries and regions in non -friendly countries and regions are mostly negative.Friendly countries and regions are exactly the opposite,Even the relatively neutral United States, what we currently see is that the size of encrypted asset enthusiasts is not small, and it has become one of the important objects for the presidential election.
05 Summary
As Hayden Adams, founder of Uniswap, said that this is a positive signal.In the past four years, Biden has performed badly for the cryptocurrency and technology industries. Harris has hinted that her government will handle it in different ways in the future to support innovation.
Next, I believe that no matter who comes to power, the encryption industry will receive friendly support than now. Under the leadership of the new leaders of encryption, supervision is more open and tolerant, and the institution dares to actively participate in investment and construction.The mainstream encrypted assets further deepen their understanding.
