Jupiter collaborated with Irene ZHAO pushing the obtsenarian detective exposure of fraud black history

Source: Crypto City

Disputes of cooperation with Irene ZHAO

Decentralized cryptocurrency polymer Jupiter has recently fell into a storm due to announced that he had cooperated with a controversial KOL.The anonymous founder of Jupiter, a decentralized exchange of Solana, announced on the X platform yesterday (July 23) that he will cooperate with Kol Irene ZHAO from Singapore to launch a mystery.This news sparked strong dissatisfaction in the cryptocurrency community, because Irene Zhao had previously involved multiple suspicious activities related to encryption.

>

Jupiter’s anonymous founder MEOW Miao announced that it cooperated with Kol Irene Zhao in Singapore to launch a mysterious currency

According to the content of the announcement, the cooperation aims to improve the “ecology of the coin” and provide encrypted enthusiasts with a “chain mother” that can be rely on when sadness.He also pointed out that the plan hopes to solve major issues such as “fake allocation, grab running” and “lying KOL” in the current currency issuance environment.

“If the plan is successful, Ideally, you can provide a model for other mini coins to compare the” grabbing, black box control, real -time selling, and paranoia we see. “”

However, this announcement has quickly attracted criticism of many netizens. Most of the comments are blame that what Jupiter is saying is completely inconsistent with what they do, because the cooperation with Irene Zhao is completely supporting fraud activities.Detective Zachxbt on the chain asked a series of evidence to tease the irony of the cooperation and pointed out that Irene Zhao had conducted opaque transactions in her SO-COL project.Zachxbt accused Irene ZHAO who used to conduct secret transactions with DWF before, scamming early investors, and the community was completely unaware of this.

>

Detective Zachxbt on the chain sent a series of evidence to tease the irony of this cooperation

The contents of these allegations are also included in X’s community remarks, and added: “Irene Zhao has participated in multiple project fraud. Be careful when dealing with them.” And is considered “there is yesThe evaluation of help, as of the end of the draft, the remarks have been watched 81,000 times, and are generally considered by netizens to be “quoted the excellent source” and “providing important related situations”.

>

Netizens have noted the content of Meow Meow’s announcement, and received positive comments from most netizens. Source: x

Controversy and response in early projects

Netizen ICing on X also mentioned: “The network is memory” and organized the project involved in Irene Zhao in the past, including the most controversial $ SIMP, and Irenedao NFT.

So-col ($ SIMP)

According to the evidence provided by ZACHXBT, in February this year, the market manufacturer DWF LABS invested $ 1.5 million and purchased the native $ SIMP token of the Irene Zhao SO-COL project.Irene Zhao promised to lock these tokens for one year until February 2024.However, from the data on the chain, DWF received more than 3 million $ SIMP tokens in March, and transferred about 2.6 million $ SIMP to Kucoin in the same time period.

>

DWF transferred to the exchange before receiving the $ SIMP, and it was promised to be locked in and out of the year with Irene Zhao.

Zachxbt believes that she sells $ SIMP to DWF Labs without investors, which is completely different from the aforementioned MEOW’s expectation to solve the “black box control, instant selling, paranoid distribution ecology”.According to COINGECKO data, $ SIMP’s currency price is only 0.0009283 US dollars, and the market value is only US $ 453,900. Basically, this project is dead.

>

Jupiter collaborated with Irene Zhao pushing the obsession!Detective exposure to the history of scams, I responded?

Irenedao

In early 2022, Irene ZHAO was famous in the encryption industry for the NFT’s NFT’s NFT named “Irenedao”, which accumulated more than $ 5 million in income.The project aims to “subvert the creator economy.”The initial price of this series soared to 1.49 ETH, but according to data from NFTGO, the current floor price was 0.19 ETH, a historical highest point from 87%.

>

“Irenedao” NFT data source: nftgo

Other dispute items also include Konomi ($ Kono). $ Kono was originally listed on OKX, but in January, OKX announced its off -the -shelf $ Kono.Konomi has neither decentralized governance nor realized the cross -chain bridge plan that the project is expected to be implemented.

>

KONOMI ($ Kono) currency price trend chart source: coingecto

The response of the community and several parties

The cooperation between Jupiter and Irene Zhao triggered extensive discussion and criticism, and many people expressed dissatisfaction with Jupiter’s decision.Some netizens question whether Meow meow can represent Jupiter.

>

Netizens expressed dissatisfaction with this incident. Source: X

However, some people have a wait -and -see attitude and believe that more time is needed to observe the ultimate effect of cooperation.

>

There are also netizens who are watching and seeing, thinking that more time is needed to observe the final effect map of cooperation: X

The two parties in this incident also responded to the incident. Jupiter’s anonymous founder Meow Meow directly left a message under the post from Zachxbt: “The key concept here is the market share of allocated developers, known known as known as the market share of developers.The distribution of airdrops and long -term liquidity adjustment.

Irene Zhao himself issued a post saying: “For false statements, you will issue a statement.” (As of the end of the draft, no statement has been issued.)

>

Irene zhao’s response to this incident source: X

This storm undoubtedly provides an opportunity to reflect on the cryptocurrency community. How to find a balance between innovation and risks has become an important issue for future development.With the further advancement of cooperation, whether Jupiter and Irene Zhao can resolve disputes and win the trust of the community still take time to verify.

  • Related Posts

    The governance battle behind Aave DAO and Aave Labs’ power game

    Author: Chen Mo, source: X, @cmdefi The recent heated debate between Aave DAO vs Aave Labs and the dispute over governance rights at the protocol layer and product layer are…

    2026 Encryption Market Outlook: Embracing the “Web3 New Plutocrats” Era

    Author: danny; Source: X, @agintender In 2023, the “Los Angeles Times” once again selected Indomie as the world’s best instant noodles.This quick-cooked food from Indonesia has not only conquered taste…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Looking back to 2025: What progress has been made in global crypto regulatory policies?

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 2 views
    Looking back to 2025: What progress has been made in global crypto regulatory policies?

    Web3 The Dilemma and Future of Chinese Entrepreneurs

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 0 views
    Web3 The Dilemma and Future of Chinese Entrepreneurs

    Brother Maji’s leverage game: Where does the “endless” money come from?

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 1 views
    Brother Maji’s leverage game: Where does the “endless” money come from?

    Coinbase: From regulated centralized exchange to on-chain Silicon Valley

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 1 views
    Coinbase: From regulated centralized exchange to on-chain Silicon Valley

    The Economist: Cryptocurrencies’ real threat to traditional banks

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 0 views
    The Economist: Cryptocurrencies’ real threat to traditional banks

    Ethereum 2026: Is ETH undervalued via MVRV indicator?

    • By jakiro
    • December 16, 2025
    • 2 views
    Ethereum 2026: Is ETH undervalued via MVRV indicator?
    Home
    News
    School
    Search