A brief history of the relationship between Ethereum and ZK

Author: Donovan Choy, Blockworks; Compiled by: Wuzhu, Bitchain Vision

It all starts with Ethereum.L1 is too slow.Each node needs to re-execute transactions in the block redundantly to ensure validity, which limits scalability.

By 2020, the Ethereum community will unite around rollups as a scaling solution.Vitalik’s landmark blog post on rollups in 2021 explains how optimistic and zk rollups scale Ethereum.

Zk rollups have technical advantages in scaling, but the technology is still too expensive and far behind (more on that later).

Therefore, optimistic rollups first broke into the market.Optimistic rollups Assume that all transactions are valid until someone challenges them with fraud proof during a seven-day challenge period.

Optimistic rollups are valid, but they have hidden costs.The challenge period means that users need longer transaction end time before withdrawing funds.Locking liquidity means capital efficiency and generally poor user experience, especially in terms of chain interoperability.

Meanwhile, zk is catching up.At ETHCC 2022, Polygon, zkSync, and Scroll have all announced zkEVM, which allows Solidity developers to write code and prove the execution of EVMs – effectively allowing Ethereum to leverage zero-knowledge technology.

By 2023, zk rollups are starting to really gain attention.

Why is zk proof better than optimistic fraud proof?That is, because zk proves to be much smaller (~1-10 KB) compared to the original transaction data (megabyte size).

By proofing Ethereum transactions using zk encryption, these highly compressed proofs mean lower data availability costs and better scalability.

Although zk is taking off, the cost of generating proofs is still high.According to zkstats.io, the average cost of generating zk proofs in December 2023 is $80.21.

Fast forward to 2025.Proof costs have dropped to $1.3 per proof, an increase of about 98.4%.

What changes have been made?

now,zk rollup Each core part of the stack is broken down.

First of all, zkVM has been released.These dedicated virtual machines speed up the zk development experience and make proof of effectiveness generation more efficient.Before zkVM emerged, developers needed to write complex mathematical “circuits” to prove the execution of EVM.

Today, ZkVMs such as SP1, RISC Zero, Nexus, and OpenVM effectively enable all developers (C++, Rust) who do not have the expertise in zk encryption to democratize zk development.In the past, zkEVM enabled Solidity development only on zk rollups.Think of zkVM as a more general concept than zkEVM.

Secondly, the cost of generating proofs is declining due to market competition.Today, Risc Zero, Cysic, Lagrange and Succinct operate many competitive markets.Some are still in the test network, and some are already in operation.

Zk L2 is also turning to proof aggregation technology to amortize verification costs.It roughly works by batching multiple proofs into one proof, thus making the final proof more quickly.

These markets also require no license, which means that anyone with a GPU device can register, issue a margin and generate zk certificates.Previously, zk rollups used “centralized provers”, which meant they rented GPU/FPGA hardware from Google or Amazon.

Better proof systems are also being launched.These proof systems (e.g. Groth16, Halo2-KZG, STARK, Plonk, Expander) define algorithmically the rules for how to build and verify zk proofs.They are getting better, which means that zk proofs are getting smaller and faster and faster.This in turn means zkVM performance improvements.

Finally, there is the zk coprocessor built on top of zkVM.These things basically allow on-chain applications that do not exist in the zk execution environment to exploit the miracle of zk technology.The way it does this is to move the calculation off-chain, and thus run asynchronously with the execution of the blockchain.This enables the application to calculate complex statistics off-chain, prove it with zk, and then publish the proof on the chain.

Applications like Frax, Azuki, Etherfi, and Gearbox are using Lagrange’s zk coprocessor to bypass Ethereum L1 restrictions.

So you get it.That’s why zk is the ultimate goal.

  • Related Posts

    What is the origin of Pico Prism, the official Ethereum call?

    Deng Tong, Bitcoin Vision On October 15, Brevis released the “Pico Prism” technology product, which caused a collective call from Ethereum officials and triggered heated discussions in the community. On…

    DAT Research Report (1): Background and Introduction

    How DAT is reshaping the investment landscape In the past five years, from MicroStrategy in the United States to Metaplanet in Japan, to dozens of publicly listed companies around the…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Two leading indicators warn that Bitcoin is “fearful”

    • By jakiro
    • October 17, 2025
    • 11 views
    Two leading indicators warn that Bitcoin is “fearful”

    Coingecko: Study on Token Buyback Project Spending in 2025

    • By jakiro
    • October 17, 2025
    • 10 views
    Coingecko: Study on Token Buyback Project Spending in 2025

    Trump’s Crypto Empire: An Unprecedented Wealth Game

    • By jakiro
    • October 17, 2025
    • 13 views
    Trump’s Crypto Empire: An Unprecedented Wealth Game

    Coinbase: How global investors see the crypto market in the next 3-6 months

    • By jakiro
    • October 17, 2025
    • 12 views
    Coinbase: How global investors see the crypto market in the next 3-6 months

    When $1.8 billion in profit-making funds enter the market, can Bitcoin resist the sell-off?

    • By jakiro
    • October 17, 2025
    • 10 views
    When $1.8 billion in profit-making funds enter the market, can Bitcoin resist the sell-off?

    What is the origin of Pico Prism, the official Ethereum call?

    • By jakiro
    • October 17, 2025
    • 10 views
    What is the origin of Pico Prism, the official Ethereum call?
    Home
    News
    School
    Search