jakiro
Author: yuuu Source: x,@web3_yuuu
After the Fair Mint of the @Huehubofficial Huehub was launched last night, it triggered a wave of Fud and decline in the community.In the final analysis, there are two points,The first is not to match the reality; the other is that everyone does not understand the RGB ++ protocol.In this Thread, let’s talk about where the expectations are not matching, and where the deviation of the agreement with the agreement, and I see why I went to MINT more firmly after the mood of the community last night, and the following is in detail:
>
First of all, everyone expects that Huehub is not a Fair Mint tool, but a second RGB ++ asset with consensus with a consensus, and then everyone starts and makes money after playing, so that anyone will want HueTo limit the deployment of assets.However, this is obviously impossible, because the assets of the agreement are open. This centralized restriction is meaningless. Even if the Hue does not do it, there will be other people to make a tool for opening Mint.And an infrastructure DEX is to do this centralized restriction. I think it is terrible. In fact, the consensus of the second RGB ++ assets is still formed, but it is not as expected from the beginning.The consensus formation is formed, but the webpage is blank at the Mint list. This expected difference has led to the emergence of FUD emotions and the market decline.
The second point is also more critical,You haven’t felt the significance of the RGB ++ protocol yetLast night’s Fair Mint reminded many people from the time when BRC-20 哐哐 mint and then cut.Many people’s understanding of RGB ++ is to play from the second layer of ecology, so why do you feel that you do n’t put assets from NERVOS, but spend such high costs cast on the Bitcoin main network. Is n’t this a waste of NERVOS design?
But in fact,The purpose of the RGB ++ protocol itself is to serve the main network assets.Then bring the main network asset energy and decentralized to the UTXO homogeneous chain (currently only NERVOS) to play to achieve programming.But obviously, it is difficult for everyone to experience this process under the current gameplay. There are two main reasons:
The first is that there is no perception of the process of homogeneous binding. This process is really not easy to understand, but I think it is clearly marked on the NERVOS browser.In the history of the Joyid Wallet, clicking a RGB ++ transaction, you will find at least two TXs. The second is the trading of the same structure on the NERVOS.If you click on this transaction, you will see the detailed information of the same structure in the browser, which will indicate the packaging main network TX, as well as witness information.
>
>
The second reason is also the most important thing, that is, the current NERVOS ecological infrastructure is seriously inadequateThere is no decent dex, so that after the assets are fame to the second floor, they cannot play. This causes everyone’s physical sensation to be no different from the inscription. The deployment-mint-put it.How to play.This takes a little time to develop slowly. It may take at least a month. After the basic DAPP appears, the second layer of gameplay gradually begins.
This can also answer a question of some people, why do you have to pay assets from the first layer and not directly at NERVOS.It is very simple. Nervos does not carry the consensus of so many native assets. In the past, there were hundreds of tokens on Nervos, and I did n’t see which one was fried. Do you want to fry it in the 101st?It’s almost 0.
Finally, why I still have confidence, very simple,That is the fundamentals that have not changedFUD is mainly derived from short -term emotions, and the consensus of the second asset yesterday has formed, so decisively starting Mint. The previous seal held it steadily. There was a saying that it was good.Scold, you can get in the car.
