jakiro
Guide
In the 65th episode of Greenpill, GIVETH’s GRIFF Green and Gitcoin founder Kevin Owocki discussed nearly 30 different mechanisms to coordinate collective intelligence to achieve better collective resource allocation. This article refined them from them.Content of conversation.
The coordination mechanism chart was originally published by Kevin Owocki on Twitter, from Octavian
When you can get better collective wisdom, you can achieve better collective resources.This is a great thing when you try to provide funds for public affairs and build a recycled financial system.—— Kevin Owocki
Let’s start with several classic example mechanismsThe
Tithing
Shi Yi Dedication-This is an ancient religious behavior. The historical operation method is to donate part of the income to churches, non-profit organizations, etc., and it is easy to understand.What does the money do, no mandatory execution, no check -in mechanism, and need to maintain a strong cultural driving force to make it play a role.
Taxes
Taxation -just like the “mandatory” dedication, you are asked to give some part of your money to the government. The place where the tax is insufficient is that the power leads to corruption, and the central centralized agency determines the use of funds from top to bottom; the only one is the only one; the only one; the only one;The feedback path is voting. Although this process is very slow, it must be acknowledged that this is currently the best form of public goods funds.
Voting
Voting-There are many forms of voting, which shows most decisions, and democracy is also a majority decision; another way is consensus voting-basically needed absolute consistent opinions to progress.
Taxation is a fund raising mechanism. Voting is the fund distribution mechanism. There are many powerful mechanisms to raise funds for public resources. However, the distribution mechanism seems not effective. The voting will be corroded by money. So what is the distribution mechanism of “market”?
What if there is a market that trades the “clean river”?This will allow different companies to compete in this new market.Collective can use the supply and demand relationship to choose the public goods we want and reward the value creators.
Markets
Market-It is usually regarded as the best way to allocate resource allocation, but it is not suitable for collective resource allocation-the market pursues the maximization of interests, only to provide services for those who can afford the purchase price. It only applies to high-row of his products.It is obvious in the fundraising of public goods; but the market itself is a decentralized collective intelligence mechanism. It will be produced by any commodities that have consumer needs and are willing to pay, which also inspires innovation.
“The Coolest Thing About Markets is that It’ s Win-Win-Win. Nobody is Losing. If you ’res, the real prost is commons do n’t have Kets to push back. ” – Griff Green
The coolest part of the market is that it is a win -win situation. No one will lose. If you create value, you will win something. This is great.The real problem is that public items have no market for feedback adjustment.
Network-based mechanism (Web-Based Mechanisms)
As we shift from the industrial era to the age of information, we now have the opportunity to achieve a more effective governance mechanism, as well as a mechanism that can provide the scale of funds similar to the market. At the same time, it has the legitimacy and public interest brought by tax and coordination to make the economy truly the economy.Democratic, whenever people create a high -definition public product demand image, collective wisdom will invest funds to realize it.
The following are 27 mechanism discussed by Griff and Owocki. Of course, they all have some restrictions.
Quadratic funding
Secondary financing -founded by Microsoft’s Glen Weyl and Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum. This mechanism raises funds through the central fund pool to distribute funds according to the masses’ support for the project, rather than the amount of capital investment.EssenceThis is the opposite of 1: 1, and the latter is ruled by the rich, only reflecting the demand for capital.The number of secondary financing based on the number of contributors rather than the amount of funds has reduced the influence of large households and is more or more democratic.
Example: You initiated a fundraising, raised $ 100 from 100 donors, and I initiated a fundraising, only 100 US dollars from one donor, although both fundraising received $ 100 of $ 100Donation, but you will get 99%of the matching capital pool, which is conducive to guiding the funds to “the poor and many people”. Although you may only donate one dollar, you are actually part of the public’s willingness to allocate the distribution of public funds for the distribution of public fundsGuide the direction.
Question: It may be attacked by a witch, and the public capital pool is required.
Conne
Belief voting-This is a method similar to two-way financing, which also reduces the influence of the rich’s politics, but it takes time. The rules are: the proposal that is supported by the mortgage token can be withdrawn or reorganized at any time; voting for voting; votingThe weight of the weight increases with the mortgage time of the tokens. Once the proposal reaches the threshold, the proposal is passed.
If you have more tokens, you have more sayings, but even if you only have a small share, you can still promote a large proposal, but it takes longer.This is suitable for competition in the same level proposal. In all proposals, you can allocate your tokens to your preferences in various ways.This concept comes from Michael Zargham and others, and is implemented by 1HIVE.If there are many proposals to compete and clear budgets, its effect is very good, and the amount of the community wants within a given time.
Question: Many proposals are required to compete, otherwise it is easy to pass the proposal.Okay: A few opinions can actually pass the proposal.
Retroactive Public Goods Funding
Funding retrospective public goods -Karl Floersch is the source of inspiration for this mechanism, and they implement this mechanism on Optimism.They created an expert committee and distributed income from the Optimism network to the expert committee, and they allocated funds to things that provided value to the ecosystem.
The advantage is that more talents can carry out current public goods development based on the expected income of the future. At the same time, the funders do not need to worry about the problem of measurement of funding.
Network goods
Online products-private items are competitive, iPhone is an example: you must afford it to own it; public goods are non-competitive, such as breathing air: everyone can contact air, not affected by financial conditions, not affected by financial conditionsEssenceOnline products become more valuable as more and more people consume, just like open source software.The more attention to NFT art, the higher the value of its value. By issuing NFT artworks for public items, the value of NFT artwork is increased through the spread of public items to achieve funding purpose.
Effective altruism
Effectiveness -effective altruism follows the principle of cost and benefits. It aims to fund the most efficient and best groups, and the most money for each penny is the most.
Kevin: Effective altruism is based on such a theory: we do not actually donate to have influence, but to make ourselves feel better.Effective altruism is a philosophical thinking, and everyone is different in actual operations. If we classify public undertakings from the perspective of utilitarianism, how can we judge which cause can produce the greatest benefits?
Suppose I donate $ 5 and buy 5 mosquito -proof tents. This can save 100 people from malaria within 5 to 10 years in a certain area; and the same money helps other projects can only save 2 people and treat funding with similar mechanisms.Public items are sorted and donated our money to the most effective public items, which is very interesting.
The limitation of effective altruism is that this model cannot recognize that for the future, it cannot prove effective items, so it is suitable for large -scale operation, which will produce a integration effect.
GRIFF: The problem of effective altruism is that it is difficult to analyze the data.It is essentially qualitative, but we are trying to quantify it.But some value cannot be quantified. For example, how much is a sunset worth?These are all money vector.A more direct ethical dilemma is the problem of trams: how to quantify the value of life?
Hypercerts
Super Certificate -Owocki is cooperating with Protocol Labs to develop this mechanism.The principle of the super certificate is: Assuming I collected ten tons of carbon in the atmosphere and obtained a certificate, then this certificate may be valuable in the market, because another person may be ten tons of tons.
Super certificates can prove similar impact factor contributions to any impact vector. I saved ten people, picked ten tons of garbage, and supported ten old grandma crossing the road.Then start a market that affects the appraisers and attract those who want to collect Hypercerts to show their virtues. Web3 provides a practical virtue proof.
We are starting a tripartite market. Any DAO that has a positive impact can issue super certificates. The influential appraisers can seal certification, and those who care about them can buy them.
The general value is that any DAO, which has a positive impact, can be transformed from worrying about how much influence can be captured to how much influence can be created.It means that more capital and talents can inflow the influence DAO.
At the same time, this also solves the problem of effective benefits mentioned above -if you can create a decentralized market that is regulated by collective intelligence, people can issue, evaluate and purchase super certificates, then you can have a influenceThe decentralized data source of force is used to detect whether the impact of the future is happening.
Why did they play a role in the past?The influence market exists before the emergence of NFT, and it is not fresh, but it is not often talked about in traditional systems. What is the difference now?
Global transparent, programmable, and unable to tampering, such as carbon emissions, the influence is flowing in the global system. Before people lack a foundation for reaching consensus;It will be the most difficult part. Carbon emissions can be regarded as a subset of the large -scale application of super certificates. The regulations that organize the share of carbon emissions, 99% come from the government regulations, but a decentralized market, how can we apply thisPressing pressure?Do you let Vitalik push the article?Or does the number of super certificates be used as a hard requirement for funding?I think to achieve the application of large -scale modifications, the most likely things to use social and cultural power to make the collection of super certificates a fashionable thing may be a bit possible, but before that, we can still build a market, a market, oneDonate the game.
Augmeented bonding curve
Enhanced bond curve-bond curve is a smart contract, a means of starting the market. The method is to cast the corresponding tokens for reserve assets. Whenever they add assets, it will cast tokens., To release the mortgage; the trading target of the tokens is the contract, so there is no need to have a buyer when selling. The price of the tokens rises with each casting, and it will fall with the burning.Discover problems at the time.
The enhanced bond curve (ABC) increased the cost during the casting and destruction. Therefore, when the asset was sent to the ABC to cast token, some of the funds entered the capital pool managed by the token holder, and the rest were used for casting for casting.Token.
If someone destroys it by sending the tokens to ABC, some of the released funds released will enter the collective.This is a market -based continuous capital flow. As long as there is trading, the price of asset prices will be found.
ABC also adds a “Hatch” in its initialization. It collects funds before issuing bond curves. Part of the funds are used to cast tokens for all participants at the same price and the other funds for collective.
Dominant Assurance Contracts
Leading guarantee contract -guaranteed contract is a premise of funding commitment, “I want to fund this project, but only when others do it.”All funds will be refunded.Kickstarter is famous for this model.
The leading guarantee contract is further, it is a kind of gambling: if the contract reaches the goal, the main investor will get back their funds and some profits, but if the project does not get funds, then his money will be assigned to all the secondary minorities.Holders, so this is a game of making money and donating eyesight. Both the self -ism and altarism have sufficient incentives to participate.The development of the concept.
Donation mining
Donation of mining-Giveth.io is a community-driven, aiming to fund non-profit organizations and social undertakings. GIVBACKS is its previous donor reward mechanism. Every two weeks, GIVBACKS will reward GIV governance tokens to verify the effect impact.The donor of the Li project allows donors to establish their own influence in the organization when funding the development of public goods, and look forward to improving the value of GIV through the network effect to obtain returns. In addition to Giback, they can also participate in GIVPOWER.The pledge GIV token increases the exposure of a certain funding project and has received mining rewards.
Pairwise (Formerly Budget Box)
Two or two comparisons (predecessor are budget box) -This tools come from the Colony Ecosystem (2018).Two or two comparison evaluations refer to two options on the screen, you choose the one you like more; in the end, you will get a list based on your preferences.Your sorting can be merged with other people’s sorting. You can eventually get an orderly list, an first option or a weighted list for allocating budgets.
Cooperative filtering: It will match you with similar preferences.Through large -scale data sets and collective selection preferences, once you have enough number of user configuration file data, you can use collaborative filtering to evaluate other choices they may like without having to make various complex options.
In addition, the voting should be a signal aggregation in nature.With a personal server, running your own personal AI robot, training it to vote for you by sending all online content and even personal private messages. You only need to observe the availability occasionally, which will be great.
FUTURCHY
Future Politics -created by Robin Hanson, future politics is a kind of bet, betting in the future will have an influence mechanism in the future. You declare that a proposal will have an impact.It will get rewards, and otherwise loses bets.This is like the impact of proposal on the economy or other projects you are voting, including in your voting choice, it introduces voters into the predictive market, so what policies can be screened in the market will create indicators for national well -being. This uses the market to use the market.The danger is that once a indicator becomes a goal, it is no longer a good indicator.
Stigmergy
Stimulating collaboration-This is an indirect coordination mechanism, or the characteristics of all coordination mechanisms, not the mechanism itself.Stimulating collaboration is a trace of historical action, limiting the scope of consensus, and finally reaching the goal of coordination.The principle is that the traces left by individual actions in the environment stimulate the same or different agents to perform follow -up operations. This is the way of ant coordination operation. They leave irritating marks and guide other ants to achieve their goals.
If you can build a trust network and tell others that these are trustworthy people, they have high credibility, and the more good things they do, the higher their credibility; for example, when people are on GitcoinShare their behavior after donation, which is a pheromone behavior that inspires others to donate; this mechanism has a self -enhancement attribute.
Praise
Appreciation -A collaborative reward/reputation system that is from bottom to top, point -to -point, and appreciate to maintain a reward fund by giving appreciation to community members.The appreciation will automatically calculate and record. Every two weeks, a group of quantitatives will score the value of each appreciation.Based on these quantitative results, the token is rewarded, and each token is allocated to each appreciation.The motivation for praise is grateful, high emotions, enthusiasm, etc. At the same time, these rich data can be used to motivate contributions, inform the community who is doing, and so on.People vote for each other to inform everyone who thinks it is valuable and who is increasing value, which creates a similar trust network model. Now we can invest tokens on the trust network, which is cooler
In Regen Web3, we are linked financial capital with other types of capital (such as social and cultural capital), and also enable financial services to social and cultural capital.Refer to the theory of Gregori Langdu and his 8 capital forms.
Demurrage
Star fees-It is a bit like inflation-increased tokens to reduce the value of the unit, but the same goal (the currency is depreciated over time).In the stagnation fee, if you have one currency unit and hold it, and over time, you will only have 0.99 currency units in the end, and other 0.01 currency units will be put into a common fund pool. This mechanism will beThe purpose of inspiring currency circulation is mainly to refer to the characteristics of easy loss of assets, such as rice or flour, they will rot over time. Therefore, the church will issue a sealThe value will become smaller over time, and the stagnation period is originally derived from shipping, which means “staying” (ancient French), which refers to the loss required for the time to uninstall the goods from the ship.This is “liquidation damage compensation”.Although there are examples of relatively successful stagnant currencies, they have caused similar results compared to inflation, but the latter’s user experience seems better, and the stagnation fee is a bit like mandatory tax.
Proposal inverter
Proposal inverter-Proposal inverters are generated in the study coordinated by DAO and DAO. Generally, proposal is a proposal to face a DAO. Now the proposal inverter is used as a middleware.Personal assistant or DAO, if a proposal may solve the problem of multiple DAOs, they can be funded together, and then the funds are collected and distributed according to the milestone.
PROP HOUSE
The props library-NOUNS DAO created this kind of capital mechanism. The community made funds raising funds in their community libraries. In the process of raising these funds, the builders can think that each round of funding can have a certain amount of funds from a certain number of funds.The proposal was won, and then the community tokens voted to vote and select the best proposal to obtain a certain amount of funds.
Quadrantic voting
Second voting -secondary funding is a branch of the second voting. It can not only measure the preferences of the population, but also measure the intensity of these preferences. It is a way to replace one person and one -vote system.You will get a certain number of voting points and you can vote on any number of problems. You can add weight to each proposal is the square root of the voting points you bet behind this problem.According to the number of voting points that someone has put on specific issues, not only can they see the preferences of voters, but also their preference for the problem.This avoids the result of the ruling of the rich, that is, the sound of decibels affects the judgment of voters’ favorite, but the extensive consensus of the crowd has been controlled.It also encourages voting multiple proposals instead of putting all voting points on one proposal.
Jokerace
Created by Jokedao, this mechanism is a bottom -up chain governance method. You can tell a joke on the Jokedao channel. If you are funny enough, you can get a funding. It can be used for anything., Including planning community route maps, generating creativity, supporting reward tasks, etc.There are different forms of voting methods for funny determinations, including 1 generation currency: 1 vote, voting at attenuation over time, and second voting. The best thing is that they host a distributed decentralized joke competition every week
Outsider
$ 25 trillion oppooth
25 trillion US dollars opportunities -the field of public items is a serious business!If we can better improve the world than the government, we can decide those funds that are currentlyted by the government with value and nothing to harvest to the society. There are more than $ 25 trillion for public items each year.If we can create a more efficient system and capture a small part of the value created, entrepreneurs can enter this field and innovate.We may even transform personal items into public goods: food, water, residence and other basic needs -incorporate them into the field of public goods.
“We Can Invent Higher Resolution Mechaanisms for Democracy. Regen web3 is a block ocean of oppooth.”
We can create a higher resolution mechanism for democracy.Regen Web3 is a blue ocean full of opportunities.
Holographic Consensus -OG DAO technology proposed by Daostack, holographic consensus is a mixture of future politics and conventional DAO voting.Anyone can make a proposal (very easy), token holders can “bet” (vote) of the proposal. When they do this, they will “enhance” the proposal in order to get more attention and even speed up to speed upVoting process.If the proposal is passed, those who bet the bet will win the tokens (GRIFF “), and those who vote opposition will lose their shares.
Here you have considered the attention economy. Not everyone has time to pay attention to all proposals and votes, but when the person you know vote for a certain proposal, it is equivalent to that he has made some recognition for you, and you may follow it up.When there are many proposals and too many things that need to be concerned, this method can play a good role.
The holographic consensus is conducive to maintaining scalability and elasticity at the same time. It is difficult for the two to achieve at the same time. In this way, the betting person played the role of market forecasting.
Skeuomorphism
Matteringism -is a classification of a mechanism, not the mechanism itself, and the objectism divides the coordination mechanism into the right and non -propaganda.An example is the information retrieval method selected by Google and Yahoo.Yahoo is materialism, because they use the traditional library card directory system model, you can search for the content you are interested in according to the parent theme and sub -theme, just like you find a book along classification in the physical library.Google is a non -modal. It provides information retrieval results by creating a simple search box. This is an unprecedented way of the Internet.
“The Earliest Ideas for BlockChain Ledger Technology are going to be just to port over existing method and Ideas. The best, the problem Skeuomorphic. “— Kevin Owocki
The earliest idea of blockchain account technology will only transplant the existing methods and ideas.The best and most interesting mechanisms will be non -properly.
Taking lots -rarely used in real life. The jury’s responsibilities are an exception. The lottery involves a few people from one child of possible voters and let them make their own decisions.It is a bit like a delegation, but it is randomly selected from the larger crowd, “ordinary people”.Why is it not common in blockchain?There is no conclusion yet!
Aqueduct
The water canal-the canal in the irrigation system is used to guide the water from one system to another. If we want to build a diversified public item fund system, what will it look like to establish a bridge between different public items funding mechanismsIntersectionSend a canal from your DAO to another DAO and connect the module connecting public items funds.A canal that can connect any other mechanism in the ecosystem.Just like Radicle Drips -You can program your income from here and where to program your income according to your governance.This is a cycle of tokens.Set it and forget it.
OWOCKI ’s EXAMPLE is Gitcoin Grant 2’ s New “Aqueduct”: A Project Will Alocate A Percentage of ITS DAO-GOVERNED FUNDS to the Gitcoin Grant ’s G Pool, Which Will Run A Quadratic Funding Round Based on The Project ’s Vesting Schedule.
The example of OWOCKI is the new “water canal” of Gitcoin Grant 2: A project will allocate a part of the matching pool of Gitcoin Grant, a project managed by DAO. The pool will raise secondary funds according to the project’s belonging plan.
High Level Primitive Here is Simply “Money (Token) Streaming”.Senior primitives are simply “currency (token) flow here.
RANKED Choice Voting
Ranking Choose Voting -No more representative to vote, but you can submit a series of serial lists (the first choice, the second choice, etc.).In fact, the votes are calculated in one way. This method gives the seemingly minority candidates with the opportunity and allow voters to express their true preferences, rather than strategically voted to the “two harms power to take the lightness.”Candidate.Eliminate the problem of third parties to destroy votes.Voting for 4-8 candidates is very useful.
Staking/Slashing
Praising/cutting -pledge on Ethereum means saving 32 ETHs, thereby activating the verification device software and following the consensus rules of the agreement in exchange for a small amount of issuance interest.If you provide false information to the agreement, or basically do any behavior that may lead to a consensus, your pledge may be cut, that is, you will lose deposit.If you continue to be offline for a day or two, a small part may be cut because it is not active.This system creates an encrypted economy incentive, because funds are in risks, and they can be pledged, cut or increased through the agreement at any time.This is a way to bind capital and protocol behavior.
Disadvantages: It requires capital and to a certain extent.
Proof-of-work
Proof of work-the workload certificate is the predecessor of the certificate of equity, and it still works in Bitcoin (unfortunately it will generate a large amount of carbon emissions). In fact, it is used in many projects to be used in high-energy Bitcoin networks of the Bitcoin network.Distribution resources.This resource is issuance (“printing money”).Griff gives a few examples, such as Curecoin and Foldingcoin, which reward the issuance (tokens) through useful workload proofs (fold protein) to find methods for cure for cure, Alzheimer’s disease and other diseases.People with folding more protein will get more issuance.
DECENTRALIZED IDentity
Decentralization — We do not want the oligopoly digital identity, privacy to be crushed or leaked; we hope to have sovereign digital identity (assuming that it is protected).An important opportunity is that we can build a system that does not regard participants as exchanges.We can build a mechanism and adopt one person and one vote. This is more democratic, or in a one -generation currency and one vote, or in the two (such as the second secondary voting).
In order to build a more regenerative encrypted economy Internet, we need to be able to perform positive and game and repeat interaction with each other -you have done a thing to help me, and you get a certificateThis is very interesting based on the trust of certified behavior.By continuously accumulating positive and reputation, we will turn on a virtuous circle, which increases the complexity of all coordinated mechanisms mentioned in this episode for the complexity of the combined design to accommodate huge amounts of active active behavior.Over time, the system will begin to produce gravity, so as to create an economic gravitational well, attract more people to participate.Repeat the cycle until we have an encrypted economy.
Web3 social
Decentralized social media applications are very good, because they have the characteristics of sovereignty, privacy, and we can bring social relationship maps from one website to another.It takes time to establish a network effect.Once we will pay attention to the social transfer of Web2, have our own social relationship map and can be split interface, and reflect the commonality of our influence circle in the social map.Center, this is also one of the future of group coordination mechanisms.
