Blocknative: Private transactions are dominating the flow of Ethereum orders

Author: Alex O’Donnell, CoinTelegraph; Compiled by: Tao Zhu, Bitchain Vision

A report from Blocknative on August 20 shows thatPrivate transactions now dominate the order flow of Ethereum as users seek to protect transactions from preemptives.

Blocknative saysAlthough private order flow still accounts for only about 30% of Ethereum transactions, it consumes more than half of the gas on the network.The report said the shift created “a new centralized carrier because the flow of private transaction orders is accessible only to licensed network participants.”

Private orders involve sending transactions directly to validators, an arrangement called “dark pools” rather than entering a public queue.Public transactions may be preceded by automated trading “robots” that make money at the expense of users—a practice known as Maximum Extractable Value (MEV).

Private orders consume more than 50% of gas on Ethereum.Source: Blocknative

“To protect MEVs, users often choose to transfer transactions privately, especially when performing more complex (and therefore require a lot of gas) on-chain operations (such as exchanges),” Blocknative said. “In turn, the gas consumed by each transaction of these transactions,”More than non-MEV transactions.”

According to Blocknative, private order flow is dominated by a handful of block builders, namely Beaver, Titan, Rsync and Flashbots, all of which “have shown a significant increase in private order flow since March.”The report said gas consumption of these block builders increased by 130% to 150% during this period.

According to Blocknative,The growth of dark pools has negatively impacted users participating in public transaction queues, including more unstable and unpredictable gas prices.

“When most of the block space is occupied by privately sent transactions, the observability of the on-link gas fees is reduced,” the report said.

“This means that either you will be priced too low and eventually causing the transaction to get stuck, or you will be priced too high to ensure the transaction will be on the chain, and that possibility will increase.”

  • Related Posts

    Viewpoint: Layer2 cannot support ecological prosperity by relying solely on Ethereum security inheritance

    Author: Haotian; Source: X, @tmel0211 In recent days, there have been more discussions around Ethereum layer2. SEC members expressed on the podcast that relying on centralized sorters will be regarded…

    Why are ETH Maxi and SOL Maxi always facing each other?

    I found an interesting phenomenon when I visited the English blogger circle: $ETH Maxi and $SOL Maxi are always against each other. The ETH side mocked SOL for the low…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Can tokenized stocks truly achieve decentralization?

    • By jakiro
    • September 12, 2025
    • 16 views
    Can tokenized stocks truly achieve decentralization?

    The era of all-weather trading is coming?BlackRock explores “tokenization” of ETFs

    • By jakiro
    • September 12, 2025
    • 17 views
    The era of all-weather trading is coming?BlackRock explores “tokenization” of ETFs

    Hyperliquid’s stablecoin USDH: Battle for Control

    • By jakiro
    • September 12, 2025
    • 10 views
    Hyperliquid’s stablecoin USDH: Battle for Control

    RWA: On-chain IPO and Recombination of Real-world Assets

    • By jakiro
    • September 12, 2025
    • 15 views
    RWA: On-chain IPO and Recombination of Real-world Assets

    Viewpoint: Layer2 cannot support ecological prosperity by relying solely on Ethereum security inheritance

    • By jakiro
    • September 12, 2025
    • 15 views
    Viewpoint: Layer2 cannot support ecological prosperity by relying solely on Ethereum security inheritance

    Crypto Asset Vault Revolution

    • By jakiro
    • September 12, 2025
    • 12 views
    Crypto Asset Vault Revolution
    Home
    News
    School
    Search